Progress in science education is assessed by students and teachers who rate each other both during and at the end of the land and sea components. Over longer periods, successful advancement of marine science education by Beam Reach will be quantified by a growing number of applicants and participants, as well as the percentage of our alumni who describe Beam Reach as a formative, valuable experience.
Enhancement of sustainable technologies by Beam Reach is measured by increases in efficiency and decreases in environmental impacts of school activities. Successful promulgation is defined by an exchange of technologies and practices with affiliate organizations that is rated positively by service project participants from both the Beam Reach and the destination port communities. An additional metric for assessing effective promulgation is the percentage of alumni who report that Beam Reach led to more sustainable practices in their personal lives.
Essential questions elicit the core learning opportunities and outcomes of Beam Reach. Unit questions are specific to individual voyages and their geographic, ecological, and cultural contexts.
Essential questions:
Outcomes |
Assessments |
search, read, and analyze scientific literature | faculty and peer rating of retrieval, analysis, and presentation of an article at the weekly journal club; successful generation of a bibliography (using bibtex format) in the final paper |
acquire and retain new information from readings, oral presentations, and/or discussions | automatic (extra credit) grading of on-line quizzes designed by faculty and students to test comprehension of reading, oral presentations, and/or discussions |
ask scientific questions (related to Beam Reach research themes, ship tracks, the concerns of educational or scientific affiliates, available equipment, etc.) | faculty assessment of questions posed during short projects and in final research proposal based on questions rubric; faculty assessment of inquisitiveness during mentoring meetings, field trips, group activities, discussions, and sea component |
develop a scientific procedure to answer a particular question | faculty assessment of procedure during short projects and in final research proposal based on methods rubric; faculty assessment of scientific methodology in mentoring meetings, proposal, and final paper |
write and present a research proposal (as an individual and as a group) | faculty and peer grading of final research proposal and its presentation based on proposal rubric |
critique proposals constructively and create a group science plan through cooperation and collaboration | faculty and peer grading of performance during proposal review and generation of an integrated (group) science plan |
use journaling, structured reflection, and interaction with a mentor to accelerate personal growth, adapt to group dynamics, and thoughtfully observe the marine environment | daily web-log entry (blog including at least comments on current day and plans for next); constructive participation in group reflective activities; faculty assessment of progress toward personal goals between mentoring meetings; peer assessment of individual contributions to realizing the group science plan |
sail, navigate, solve problems, and make observations aboard a research vessel (that demonstrates sustainable technologies) | pass performance tasks related to small boats during land component; captain and watch leader assessment of vessel management skill acquisition during sea component |
analyze data using basic statistical and computational methods/tools | faculty observation of statistical and computational learning on land during short projects; faculty and peer judgments based on data analysis and presentation rubrics applied during daily reports (science and/or sustainable technology), peer-review of manuscripts, and final presentations; public assessment of educational service project based on rubrics |
distill published literature and new results into written/oral presentations | faculty assessment of short projects (based on short project rubric); faculty and peer assessment of the final paper (and its drafts); results of submittal to a peer-reviewed journal for publication |
publicize results/products through an educational or service project (that involves sharing/exchanging sci/enviro/sust_tech ideas) | faculty, peer, and public assessment of educational or service project (based on relevant rubrics). |